One of the least visible costs of African trade is the cost of time. A shipment that takes four days instead of two does not only arrive two days later. The delay can affect inventory, working capital, warehouse requirements, production schedules, transport planning and customer commitments. These costs rarely appear in a tariff schedule, but they influence whether a regional supply chain is commercially viable.

This is particularly important for cotton, textile and apparel production because these industries depend on interconnected production stages. A factory cannot sew fabric that has not arrived. A dyeing facility cannot process material that is still in transit. An apparel exporter cannot meet a buyer’s delivery window if the finished goods remain stuck at a border. The longer and less predictable the journey between production stages, the more expensive it becomes to coordinate regional manufacturing.

This creates what can be described as a border friction cost. It includes not only direct clearance charges, but also delay-related inventory costs, working-capital costs, additional logistics costs, production disruption, and the commercial risk associated with uncertain delivery. A tariff can therefore be reduced to zero while the effective cost of trading remains high.

This distinction is becoming important in the continental integration debate. The World Bank’s latest analysis argues that many of Africa’s trade costs arise behind national borders and identifies customs inefficiencies, regulatory fragmentation, transport restrictions and weak logistics as significant sources of economic distance between African markets. It recommends measuring integration through tangible outcomes such as shorter border-crossing times, lower logistics costs, more NTBs resolved and greater participation of firms in regional value chains.

For policymakers, this changes how AfCFTA success should be measured. It is not enough to ask how many tariff lines have been liberalised. The more commercially meaningful questions are how much time businesses save, how much logistics costs fall, how predictable border crossings become, and whether firms are actually responding by increasing regional sourcing and trade.

For the CTA industry, the implications are profound. A textile producer considering whether to source fabric from a neighbouring African country will compare the total landed cost and reliability of that regional supplier against alternatives outside the continent. If regional sourcing is formally duty-free but operationally unpredictable, the preference may not be enough to change the sourcing decision.

This is why trade facilitation should be treated as part of industrial policy. The competitiveness of a regional manufacturing ecosystem depends partly on the competitiveness of the corridors connecting its factories.

Resource……